<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog comments are now opened again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vikingboard.com/blog/2006/09/14/blog-comments-are-now-opened-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vikingboard.com/blog/2006/09/14/blog-comments-are-now-opened-again/</link>
	<description>Power lies in the details ...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://vikingboard.com/blog/2006/09/14/blog-comments-are-now-opened-again/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vikingboard.com/?p=39#comment-180</guid>
		<description>heh ... surely you don't think an aulde dawg like me would be so easily pleased?! *grin*

FWIW I liked the idea of comments being driven/re-directed to the forum. My "&lt;a href="http://bentrem.sycks.net/gnodal/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Participatory Deliberation&lt;/a&gt;" notion involves just that sort of mashup. But that's getting dangerously close to proprietary design information, so I'll stop here.

As I wrote to Eric Meyer earlier today, with regards to how W3C is dieing in its traces, our solutions will arise as all solutions arise: by the honest efforts of principled practioners. So, on the short term: do what works.

To rever to hippie-lingo, "Keep on keepin' on!"

p.s. when I see some UML I'll know you're solid. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh &#8230; surely you don&#8217;t think an aulde dawg like me would be so easily pleased?! *grin*</p>
<p>FWIW I liked the idea of comments being driven/re-directed to the forum. My &#8220;<a href="http://bentrem.sycks.net/gnodal/" rel="nofollow">Participatory Deliberation</a>&#8221; notion involves just that sort of mashup. But that&#8217;s getting dangerously close to proprietary design information, so I&#8217;ll stop here.</p>
<p>As I wrote to Eric Meyer earlier today, with regards to how W3C is dieing in its traces, our solutions will arise as all solutions arise: by the honest efforts of principled practioners. So, on the short term: do what works.</p>
<p>To rever to hippie-lingo, &#8220;Keep on keepin&#8217; on!&#8221;</p>
<p>p.s. when I see some UML I&#8217;ll know you&#8217;re solid. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
